We passed Core Web Vitals — do we still need this?

Probably, if your conversion rate disagrees with Lighthouse. Time-to-meaning, schema completeness, and indexation health aren’t in the CWV score — and they’re where most clients leak rank.

Will you ship the fixes?

Either — report only, or report + remediation sprint. Most clients want both, scoped one after the other.

How is this different from a free SEO audit tool?

Free audits flag generic issues without ranking them by impact on your specific traffic. We tie every finding to the URLs and templates that drive your actual traffic, so the remediation list is prioritized by what moves your number.

← All solutions

Growth levers

Technical SEO Audit.

Crawl, indexation, Core Web Vitals, schema, internal link graph: the technical layer under SEO Management that gates whether your content can rank at all.

Sprint-pricedNo retainer lockOutcome per sprint

Run discovery — 8 minutes →Send us your situation

Sprint zero · Free · No card

See the build before you sign.

Sprint zero scopes the audience and the system — you see what we’d build before you sign for the build.

Census-grounded
ACS, CBP & LEHD pulls
60+ ICP cards
Shipped, signed off
Outcome-locked
One named outcome per sprint
No retainer trap
Sprints, not rent

SEO & visibility25

You surface for the customer who's already searching.

You rank for the $2M build, not shower repair.
Your GBP shows the 2024 portfolio, not 2019.
/projects/ is back in the sitemap and indexed.

Sub-engagementSits under SEO Management→

Before & after

What this engagement actually changes.

Status quo

Your content is good but it doesn't rank. Lighthouse says you pass CWV. Search Console shows half your pages aren't indexed. Schema is missing on the templates that matter. Internal links go through nine hops to your money pages.

After the sprint

Every page indexable that should be. Schema valid on every template. Core Web Vitals tuned beyond the Lighthouse score. Internal link graph that surfaces the money pages in two clicks. A remediation plan named and ready to ship.

Deliverables

What you walk away with.

Named artifacts that ship, not verbs. If it’s on this list, the sprint isn’t done until it’s in your hands.

Full crawl report (Screaming Frog + manual review)
Indexation analysis per template
Schema validation + parity check
Core Web Vitals + time-to-meaning analysis
Internal link graph audit
Prioritized remediation list (optional follow-on sprint)

5-phase fit

Where this plugs into the system.

Every FH engagement maps to one or more phases of the 5-phase process. Lit chips are the phases this service ships against.

Phase 1Census
Phase 2Public Data
Phase 3ICPs
Phase 4System
Phase 5Sprint

New to the 5-phase process? See all five phases →

Timeline & cadence

Sprint by sprint, what ships when.

1
Week 1
Crawl + indexation pull
2
Week 2
Schema + CWV + link graph analysis
3
Week 3
Report delivered with prioritized fixes
4
Optional
Remediation sprint to ship the fixes

Engagement details

Pricing factors, in plain English.

No mystery line items. These are the specific inputs that decide how the engagement is sized and what ships at the end of it.

01
Site size (pages crawled and analyzed)
02
Whether remediation is included or scoped as a follow-on sprint
03
Schema implementation depth
04
International / hreflang scope
05
Re-audit cadence (one-shot or quarterly)

Your price

Inputs

What we need from you.

Get these together and sprint zero starts the same week.

⟶Search Console + GA4 read access
⟶Codebase or staging access (for deeper template-level review)
⟶List of templates and their typical URLs

Anti-patterns

What we won’t ship.

Hard rules. If your last agency promised one of these and the engagement broke, that’s why.

Audits that recommend fixes we wouldn't ship ourselves
Generic 40-page reports that don't prioritize impact
Schema that misrepresents the page (enforcement is real)

Fit check

Who this is for, and who it isn’t.

Right fit

Operators whose content quality outpaces their rank
Teams about to launch a relaunch and need a baseline
Marketing leads inheriting a stack and assessing tech debt

Wrong fit

Brand-new sites with under 50 URLs (too small for the audit to surface anything actionable)
Anyone who won't act on the recommendations

Proof

Sites and systems shipped on this engagement.

Every shipped project →

Questions operators ask before they book Technical SEO Audit.

We passed Core Web Vitals — do we still need this?
Probably, if your conversion rate disagrees with Lighthouse. Time-to-meaning, schema completeness, and indexation health aren’t in the CWV score — and they’re where most clients leak rank.
Will you ship the fixes?
Either — report only, or report + remediation sprint. Most clients want both, scoped one after the other.
How is this different from a free SEO audit tool?
Free audits flag generic issues without ranking them by impact on your specific traffic. We tie every finding to the URLs and templates that drive your actual traffic, so the remediation list is prioritized by what moves your number.